When it comes to choosing a reliable patient monitor, Philips consistently ranks among the top. Two popular models from their IntelliVue series, the MX800 and MX700, are widely used in hospitals and clinics worldwide. But which one is the better choice for your facility? Let’s break it down.
1. Display & User Interface
- Philips MX800: The MX800 features a large 19-inch widescreen display with a touchscreen interface. It’s designed for multi-patient monitoring and offers an incredibly clear and intuitive interface. The larger screen size makes it easy to monitor multiple parameters at once, which can be a game-changer in fast-paced environments.
- Philips MX700: The MX700 comes with a slightly smaller 15-inch touchscreen display. While it’s more compact, it still offers a high-quality, responsive interface. It’s ideal for smaller spaces or situations where mobility is important, like in emergency rooms or outpatient settings.
2. Functionality & Features
- MX800: The MX800 is Philips’ top-tier model and includes several advanced features. One of its standout capabilities is the ability to act as both a monitor and a bedside PC, allowing integration with your hospital’s IT system. This means clinicians can review lab results, imaging, and other critical data without leaving the patient’s side.
- MX700: The MX700 is a slightly more streamlined version. While it doesn’t have the built-in PC functionality of the MX800, it still offers robust monitoring capabilities, including multi-parameter tracking and seamless integration with Philips’ IntelliVue Clinical Network.
3. Connectivity & Integration
- MX800: Connectivity is where the MX800 really shines. It’s designed for full integration with other hospital systems, and its dual functionality as both a monitor and a PC can save time and reduce clutter. It supports HL7 messaging and can interface with most Electronic Medical Record (EMR) systems, making data management much smoother.
- MX700: The MX700 also offers solid connectivity options, including wireless and wired integration into the IntelliVue network. While it doesn’t have the dual functionality of the MX800, it still allows for seamless data sharing and integration with existing hospital networks.
4. Mobility & Installation
- MX800: Given its larger screen and dual functionality, the MX800 is typically mounted on a wall or bedside unit. It’s less mobile but ideal for critical care environments where constant monitoring is essential.
- MX700: If you need flexibility and mobility, the MX700 is the better option. Its smaller size makes it easier to move around or mount on carts. This makes it perfect for emergency rooms, recovery wards, or clinics that need to move equipment between rooms.
5. Price Point
- MX800: With its advanced features and larger screen, the MX800 is the more expensive option. However, its dual functionality as a bedside PC and monitor can justify the higher price for facilities that need an all-in-one solution.
- MX700: The MX700 is more budget-friendly, making it a solid choice for facilities looking for high-quality patient monitoring without the extra bells and whistles. It still offers excellent functionality at a more accessible price.
6. Best Fit
- Philips MX800: Best suited for intensive care units, critical care environments, or hospitals with advanced IT infrastructure. If your facility needs a monitor that can double as a PC and integrate with various hospital systems, this is the one to go for.
- Philips MX700: Perfect for smaller facilities, outpatient clinics, or emergency departments. If you need flexibility, mobility, and robust monitoring at a more affordable price point, the MX700 is a reliable and efficient option.
Final Verdict
Choosing between the Philips MX800 and MX700 depends on your facility’s specific needs. If you require advanced features, full system integration, and have a larger budget, the MX800 will provide everything you need and more. However, if you’re looking for a more affordable and mobile option that still offers excellent monitoring, the MX700 won’t disappoint.
Both models deliver high-quality performance, so you can’t go wrong with either. It’s just a matter of finding the right fit for your environment.
